PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.11%
Net income growth at 50-75% of RUN's 16.81%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-2.89%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 15.61%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
245.51%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. RUN's 878.57%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-0.27%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 27.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
20.77%
Less working capital growth vs. RUN's 133.99%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-385.45%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -91.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-430.46%
Negative yoy inventory while RUN is 127.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
63.23%
AP growth well above RUN's 102.12%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
59.72%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. RUN's 217.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-383.13%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -78.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
18.87%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of RUN's 72.84%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-1.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -0.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
97.83%
Acquisition growth of 97.83% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above RUN's 96.96%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
21.68%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -3.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
512.16%
Debt repayment above 1.5x RUN's 45.70%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.79%
Buyback growth of 95.79% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.