PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.35%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -15.82%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.62%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 8.16%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-28.87%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RUN stands at 202.19%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.45%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 11.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
35.68%
Slight usage while RUN is negative at -84.38%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
63.00%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. RUN's 1733.56%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
114.36%
Some inventory rise while RUN is negative at -65.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-383.90%
Both negative yoy AP, with RUN at -5862.15%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
57.31%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. RUN's 120.89%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
656.85%
Well above RUN's 192.47%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
57.23%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -37.11%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-4.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -16.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-5521.31%
Negative yoy acquisition while RUN stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -13.63%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-101.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -21.21%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.