PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-426.48%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RUN at -14.45%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
28.98%
D&A growth well above RUN's 13.07%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-776.53%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RUN stands at 129.94%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-20.81%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RUN at -12.68%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
442.78%
Slight usage while RUN is negative at -148.89%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
123.34%
AR growth while RUN is negative at -260.58%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
120.83%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. RUN's 721.49%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
90.25%
A yoy AP increase while RUN is negative at -46.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
1370.21%
Growth well above RUN's 15.19%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
297.99%
Well above RUN's 123.55%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
478.71%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x RUN's 18.98%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-26.26%
Negative yoy CapEx while RUN is 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-297.92%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-18.08%
We reduce yoy invests while RUN stands at 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-9328.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -11.81%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.01%
Buyback growth of 56.01% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.