PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-850.58%
Negative net income growth while RUN stands at 14.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
19.42%
D&A growth well above RUN's 6.67%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-3045.17%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.12%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 8.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
1583.68%
Slight usage while RUN is negative at -97.32%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-781.38%
AR is negative yoy while RUN is 59.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
205.09%
Some inventory rise while RUN is negative at -194.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.87%
Negative yoy usage while RUN is 172.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
16231.66%
Well above RUN's 110.28%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
279.96%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -282.64%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-84.96%
Negative yoy CapEx while RUN is 2.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
175.37%
Acquisition growth of 175.37% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1234.15%
Growth of 1234.15% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-68.08%
We reduce yoy invests while RUN stands at 2.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
461.78%
We repay more while RUN is negative at -616.15%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.