PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
80.31%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -34.01%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-27.78%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with RUN at -1.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
95.97%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. RUN's 249.53%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-24.11%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 92.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-260.72%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -3209.93%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
139.52%
AR growth well above RUN's 90.79%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-218.83%
Negative yoy inventory while RUN is 120.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-170.14%
Both negative yoy AP, with RUN at -180.29%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-131.53%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -132.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-92.63%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -59.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-587.06%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RUN at -109.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
71.22%
CapEx growth well above RUN's 26.20%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
539.37%
Acquisition growth of 539.37% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.13%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. RUN's 78.44%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
90.18%
Investing outflow well above RUN's 26.20%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-80.86%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RUN is 96.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1136.61%
We cut yoy buybacks while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.