PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
960.52%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -22.82%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.15%
Less D&A growth vs. RUN's 1.91%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
495.70%
Well above RUN's 106.31% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-14.39%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RUN at -45.20%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
135.30%
Well above RUN's 138.49% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
511.77%
AR growth while RUN is negative at -63.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
184.38%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. RUN's 1493.07%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
63.67%
AP growth well above RUN's 22.07%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-890.78%
Negative yoy usage while RUN is 158.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-49.71%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -32.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
111.51%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x RUN's 69.74%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
2.84%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RUN's 26.85%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.01%
We reduce yoy invests while RUN stands at 26.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
88.34%
Debt repayment above 1.5x RUN's 53.35%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.78%
Buyback growth of 78.78% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.