PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
145.21%
Net income growth above 1.5x RUN's 36.53%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-29.50%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 2.40%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-56.05%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
2.77%
SBC growth while RUN is negative at -20.85%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-8.46%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -5.36%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-26.49%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -403.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-114.81%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -30.92%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
251.90%
AP growth well above RUN's 195.59%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-120.90%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -235.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-107.79%
Negative yoy while RUN is 35.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-311.47%
Negative yoy CFO while RUN is 58.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
22.82%
Some CapEx rise while RUN is negative at -66.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.62%
Growth of 216.62% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-503.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -109.37%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while RUN is negative at -843.57%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.96%
Buyback growth of 94.96% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.