PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
814.69%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -248.30%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-78.48%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 62.81%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
2799.84%
Some yoy growth while RUN is negative at -10.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.22%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 1519.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-118.67%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -296.94%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-125.99%
AR is negative yoy while RUN is 118.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-228.89%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -207.71%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-253.18%
Both negative yoy AP, with RUN at -71.52%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
297.30%
Some yoy usage while RUN is negative at -17.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-165.75%
Negative yoy while RUN is 116.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
134.63%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -942.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
50.41%
Some CapEx rise while RUN is negative at -35.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
112.76%
Acquisition growth of 112.76% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
1927.93%
Liquidation growth of 1927.93% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-112.13%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 922.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
309.96%
Investing outflow well above RUN's 158.62%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5828.38%
We cut yoy buybacks while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.