PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-212.76%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RUN at -13.08%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-43.36%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-209.19%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RUN stands at 168.53%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-50.84%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RUN at -9.67%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-294.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -14.56%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-109.07%
AR is negative yoy while RUN is 55.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-155.30%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -99.60%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
22.47%
AP growth well above RUN's 34.04%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-239.17%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -5.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
204.59%
Well above RUN's 39.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-207.64%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RUN at -5.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
160.04%
Some CapEx rise while RUN is negative at -10.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -12.59%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19379.11%
Growth of 19379.11% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
1934.60%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -10.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
77.12%
We repay more while RUN is negative at -158.96%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.34%
Buyback growth of 81.34% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.