PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
328.19%
Net income growth above 1.5x RUN's 25.86%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-35.01%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 10.73%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-155.21%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-7.28%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RUN at -14.34%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
35.73%
Less working capital growth vs. RUN's 78.27%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-141.33%
AR is negative yoy while RUN is 64.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-131.78%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -588.74%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
517.38%
AP growth well above RUN's 114.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
59.00%
Some yoy usage while RUN is negative at -83.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-959.64%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -97.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
90.53%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x RUN's 54.58%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-8.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -5.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
104.42%
Acquisition spending well above RUN's 28.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.62%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -5.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.26%
Buyback growth of 61.26% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.