1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-94.66%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RUN at -110.87%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
18.09%
D&A growth well above RUN's 0.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
3.05%
Deferred tax of 3.05% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-17.23%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RUN at -3.94%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-115.10%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -604.97%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
109.33%
AR growth well above RUN's 106.95%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-1446.12%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -367.45%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
292.60%
AP growth well above RUN's 179.83%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-358.11%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -219.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
107.84%
Well above RUN's 153.34%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-119.63%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RUN at -239.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
61.42%
CapEx growth well above RUN's 5.19%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-89.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -80.60%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2709.17%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 80.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-106.13%
We reduce yoy invests while RUN stands at 5.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
107.83%
Debt repayment above 1.5x RUN's 5.47%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.89%
We cut yoy buybacks while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.