PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.41%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -1.47%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
52.52%
D&A growth well above RUN's 2.99%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
134.72%
Well above RUN's 131.33% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
25.91%
SBC growth while RUN is negative at -0.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
92.45%
Well above RUN's 82.10% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-4.51%
AR is negative yoy while RUN is 64.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
35.12%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. RUN's 192.46%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
105.06%
A yoy AP increase while RUN is negative at -1188.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
947.03%
Growth well above RUN's 11.13%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-106.77%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -82.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
85.81%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x RUN's 53.98%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-20.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -37.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.72%
We reduce yoy sales while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-1996.72%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 9.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-156.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -37.22%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
130.19%
We repay more while RUN is negative at -214.35%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.88%
Buyback growth of 75.88% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.