PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-54.21%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RUN at -331.71%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-98.03%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 9.44%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-79.51%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RUN stands at 59.80%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-35.29%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RUN at -1.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
843.36%
Well above RUN's 256.45% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
216.47%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. RUN's 783.99%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
281.62%
Inventory growth well above RUN's 35.14%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-2710.57%
Both negative yoy AP, with RUN at -98.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-100.22%
Negative yoy usage while RUN is 60.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1908.77%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. RUN's 12106.13%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-5.06%
Negative yoy CFO while RUN is 68.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
7.77%
Some CapEx rise while RUN is negative at -5.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
89.85%
Some acquisitions while RUN is negative at -8.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
91.97%
Growth well above RUN's 8.47%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
71.97%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -5.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-100.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -199.37%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.91%
Buyback growth of 43.91% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.