PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
60.74%
Some net income increase while SEDG is negative at -26.61%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
486.93%
Some D&A expansion while SEDG is negative at -64.79%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.50%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SEDG's 818.52%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-138.82%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 14281.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-100.51%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SEDG at -123.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
5.26%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SEDG's 87.58%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
842.50%
Growth well above SEDG's 126.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
9.37%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 1.47%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
433.72%
Issuance growth of 433.72% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.