PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.04%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -26.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
117.91%
Some D&A expansion while SEDG is negative at -64.79%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.97%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
134.34%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -386.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-783.73%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 818.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-138.65%
Negative yoy AP while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
54.55%
Some yoy usage while SEDG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2048.96%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SEDG's 14281.79%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
88.11%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -123.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-28.65%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 87.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
43.44%
We have some liquidation growth while SEDG is negative at -24.16%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
74.56%
Growth well above SEDG's 126.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-195.76%
We reduce yoy invests while SEDG stands at 1.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.