PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-531.05%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -26.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.95%
Some D&A expansion while SEDG is negative at -64.79%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-133.90%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.35%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-100.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -386.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-22.82%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 818.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
118.02%
Some yoy usage while SEDG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-9.22%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 14281.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
108.20%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -123.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
15.25%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SEDG's 87.58%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SEDG at -24.16%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-3669.78%
We reduce yoy other investing while SEDG is 126.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
54.35%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 1.47%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.