PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
708.13%
Some net income increase while SEDG is negative at -26.61%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.72%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SEDG at -64.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-143.44%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
4.10%
SBC growth while SEDG is negative at -38.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
150.95%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-181.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -386.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-153.50%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 818.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
80.99%
AP growth of 80.99% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
137.65%
Some yoy usage while SEDG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
112.79%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SEDG's 14281.79%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
946.34%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -123.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-235.47%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 87.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2383.17%
Negative yoy purchasing while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-149.58%
We reduce yoy other investing while SEDG is 126.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-229.08%
We reduce yoy invests while SEDG stands at 1.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
400.53%
Debt repayment growth of 400.53% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-104.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.