PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-95.57%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -46.62%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.22%
Less D&A growth vs. SEDG's 6.26%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
75.59%
Deferred tax of 75.59% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
20.63%
SBC growth while SEDG is negative at -0.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
56.94%
Well above SEDG's 97.86% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-94.41%
AR is negative yoy while SEDG is 144.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
149.50%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -185.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
195.83%
AP growth of 195.83% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-104.82%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 1186.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
130.36%
Some yoy increase while SEDG is negative at -66.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
13.88%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -10.62%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-80.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -121.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
123.11%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -213.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-179.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -139.39%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
346.36%
We repay more while SEDG is negative at -340.37%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.