PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1011.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 32.73%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.21%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 0.81%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1625.45%
Deferred tax of 1625.45% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
2.00%
Less SBC growth vs. SEDG's 8.59%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-150.07%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -170.39%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
2643.30%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -108.04%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-87.48%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SEDG at -32.36%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-114.07%
Negative yoy AP while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
24.24%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SEDG's 420.90%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-72.18%
Both negative yoy, with SEDG at -99.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
53.52%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -18.12%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
45.27%
CapEx growth well above SEDG's 19.08%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
69.34%
Acquisition growth of 69.34% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-540.12%
We reduce yoy other investing while SEDG is 142.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
47.56%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 22.20%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-162.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -163.19%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1837.91%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.