PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1379.79%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 182.84%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
7.08%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 2.85%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
63.39%
Some yoy growth while SEDG is negative at -87.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
2.82%
Less SBC growth vs. SEDG's 9.97%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
45.46%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -18.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
32.89%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -30.23%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
1158.73%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -1467.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-20.76%
Negative yoy AP while SEDG is 62.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
155.36%
Growth well above SEDG's 56.31%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-21.86%
Both negative yoy, with SEDG at -542.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
75.45%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of SEDG's 94.80%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-89.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -37.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
83.03%
Acquisition growth of 83.03% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.44%
Growth well above SEDG's 125.45%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-26.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -7.62%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-100.08%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 81.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.63%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of SEDG's 100.00%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.