PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
679.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 33.93%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
30.88%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 3.51%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
542.07%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SEDG's 1966.67%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-0.53%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 43.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
16.99%
Less working capital growth vs. SEDG's 264.03%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
125.75%
AR growth well above SEDG's 121.76%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
749.51%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -313.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
136.48%
AP growth well above SEDG's 138.66%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-545.94%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -91.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-341.00%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 118.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
477.41%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SEDG's 3846.90%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-98.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -112.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-11918.40%
Negative yoy acquisition while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-891.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -4576.19%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-384.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -317.81%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
32350.88%
We repay more while SEDG is negative at -2419.55%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.56%
Buyback growth of 51.56% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.