PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-121.56%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 76.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.17%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SEDG at -3.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-121.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 542.86%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.78%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 110.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-69.90%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -524.46%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
126.87%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -1319.56%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-158.13%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 4.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-213.14%
Both negative yoy AP, with SEDG at -73.79%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
100.93%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SEDG's 501.22%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
127.29%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SEDG's 1508.79%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-192.69%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SEDG at -234.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
45.69%
Some CapEx rise while SEDG is negative at -140.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-861.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while SEDG is 91.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
68.83%
We have mild expansions while SEDG is negative at -31.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-374.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -6.14%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2400.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.