PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.22%
Net income growth under 50% of SEDG's 55.26%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
10.08%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 11.40%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
85.55%
Some yoy growth while SEDG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
3.65%
Less SBC growth vs. SEDG's 24.33%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-59.85%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SEDG is 105.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-0.82%
AR is negative yoy while SEDG is 148.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
79.04%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 44.31%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-227.44%
Negative yoy AP while SEDG is 586.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-1409.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -567.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1356.89%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 131.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-86.96%
Negative yoy CFO while SEDG is 220.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-74.34%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 31.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.51%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -10.06%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
491.42%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 30.19%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
63.18%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of SEDG's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.81%
Buyback growth of 95.81% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.