PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-271.96%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 55.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
18.83%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 25.25%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
3657.90%
Deferred tax of 3657.90% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
6.11%
Less SBC growth vs. SEDG's 51.91%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
63.38%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -1002.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
598.86%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -223.48%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-149.08%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 36.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-8.83%
Both negative yoy AP, with SEDG at -131.86%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-51.34%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 149.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
35.89%
Some yoy increase while SEDG is negative at -99.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
50.99%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -62.10%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-12.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -16.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-109.96%
Negative yoy acquisition while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.80%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -286.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-149.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -7.65%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.60%
Debt repayment growth of 99.60% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.30%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.