PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.89%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 67.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.76%
Less D&A growth vs. SEDG's 20.16%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
57.01%
Deferred tax of 57.01% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
10.59%
Less SBC growth vs. SEDG's 21.45%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-205.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -27.91%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-91.34%
AR is negative yoy while SEDG is 105.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
10.31%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -25.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
149.26%
AP growth well above SEDG's 61.47%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-380.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -110.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
38.74%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SEDG's 3100.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-185.68%
Negative yoy CFO while SEDG is 120.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-41.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 42.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
611.40%
Acquisition growth of 611.40% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.62%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -7699.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
138.19%
We have mild expansions while SEDG is negative at -1287.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-3342.90%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.02%
Buyback growth of 34.02% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.