PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.47%
Some net income increase while SEDG is negative at -13.71%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.64%
Less D&A growth vs. SEDG's 8.88%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-102.85%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.27%
Less SBC growth vs. SEDG's 18.29%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-48.13%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SEDG is 34.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-36.05%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -1526.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
63.94%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 126.76%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-176.98%
Both negative yoy AP, with SEDG at -224.03%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
10.27%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SEDG's 803.33%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
117.59%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SEDG's 450.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-24.60%
Negative yoy CFO while SEDG is 17.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
42.23%
Some CapEx rise while SEDG is negative at -152.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-111.59%
Negative yoy acquisition while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SEDG's 106.56%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-297.77%
We reduce yoy invests while SEDG stands at 30.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
580.36%
Debt repayment growth of 580.36% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1274.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.