PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.11%
Some net income increase while SEDG is negative at -16.95%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.89%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 19.13%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
245.51%
Deferred tax of 245.51% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.27%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SEDG at -8.81%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
20.77%
Less working capital growth vs. SEDG's 66.04%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-385.45%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -76.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-430.46%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 103.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
63.23%
AP growth well above SEDG's 119.90%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
59.72%
Some yoy usage while SEDG is negative at -59.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-383.13%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 83.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
18.87%
Operating cash flow growth similar to SEDG's 17.55%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-1.71%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 29.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
97.83%
Acquisition growth of 97.83% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -97.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
21.68%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 26.37%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
512.16%
Debt repayment growth of 512.16% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.79%
Buyback growth of 95.79% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.