PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.35%
Some net income increase while SEDG is negative at -9.59%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.62%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 9.21%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-28.87%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.45%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 29.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
35.68%
Less working capital growth vs. SEDG's 228.15%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
63.00%
AR growth well above SEDG's 27.05%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
114.36%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 220.78%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-383.90%
Both negative yoy AP, with SEDG at -344.48%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
57.31%
Growth well above SEDG's 86.79%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
656.85%
Well above SEDG's 2.79%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
57.23%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SEDG's 35.12%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-4.10%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 7.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-5521.31%
Negative yoy acquisition while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.25%
We reduce yoy invests while SEDG stands at 70.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-101.06%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.