PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-426.48%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -37.47%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
28.98%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 13.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-776.53%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-20.81%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 12.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
442.78%
Well above SEDG's 223.70% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
123.34%
AR growth well above SEDG's 212.85%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
120.83%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -93.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
90.25%
AP growth well above SEDG's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
1370.21%
Some yoy usage while SEDG is negative at -113.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
297.99%
Some yoy increase while SEDG is negative at -1017.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
478.71%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SEDG's 1.48%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-26.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -88.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-297.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -8519.15%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-18.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -32.70%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-9328.11%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.01%
Buyback growth of 56.01% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.