PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-227.81%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -3.13%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-3.18%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 7.94%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
615.99%
Deferred tax of 615.99% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-5.80%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 4.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
43.71%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -103.65%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-228.96%
AR is negative yoy while SEDG is 148.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-21.81%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 76.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
132.85%
A yoy AP increase while SEDG is negative at -110.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-26.80%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -111.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
793.74%
Some yoy increase while SEDG is negative at -71.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
47.66%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -31.40%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
8.55%
CapEx growth well above SEDG's 11.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
1728.56%
Acquisition growth of 1728.56% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
280.77%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -102.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
3204.14%
We have mild expansions while SEDG is negative at -2651.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-836.47%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.74%
Buyback growth of 91.74% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.