PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
76.46%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 32.04%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-35.85%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 27.64%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-11.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.82%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 11.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
17.99%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -3337.50%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
16.15%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -480.38%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
32.92%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SEDG's 123.09%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-78.12%
Negative yoy AP while SEDG is 228.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
36.80%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SEDG's 277.30%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-99.53%
Both negative yoy, with SEDG at -7.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-32.48%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SEDG at -21.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
6.25%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SEDG's 13.86%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.24%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SEDG's 94.76%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-104.70%
We reduce yoy invests while SEDG stands at 8.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
151.93%
Debt repayment growth of 151.93% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.68%
Buyback growth of 6.68% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.