PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-51.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -73.38%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.76%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 25.99%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-726.54%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
16.21%
SBC growth well above SEDG's 9.32%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
154.38%
Well above SEDG's 193.41% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
225.63%
AR growth well above SEDG's 45.52%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
331.25%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -347.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while SEDG is 838.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
17.14%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SEDG's 211.86%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
3971.78%
Well above SEDG's 126.48%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
83.73%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SEDG's 36.52%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-90.66%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 1.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-240.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -835040.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-237.82%
We reduce yoy invests while SEDG stands at 43.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-61.21%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.48%
Buyback growth of 19.48% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.