PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-117.45%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 26.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-32.11%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SEDG at -2.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-38525.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-20.65%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 54.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
126.73%
Less working capital growth vs. SEDG's 2520.09%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
104.80%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -17.95%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-125.59%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 1747.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
111.69%
A yoy AP increase while SEDG is negative at -41.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-69.46%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 59.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
73.95%
Some yoy increase while SEDG is negative at -94.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
55.50%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SEDG's 35.28%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-52.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -49.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-111.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17330.70%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -201.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
707.59%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 82.44%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-83.41%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 93.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.77%
Buyback growth of 40.77% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.