PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
128.32%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 25.46%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
18.05%
Some D&A expansion while SEDG is negative at -2.21%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
395.60%
Well above SEDG's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
63.76%
SBC growth well above SEDG's 23.05%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-207.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -46.72%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-801.27%
AR is negative yoy while SEDG is 83.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
55.84%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -373.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
62.45%
AP growth well above SEDG's 67.86%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-1072.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -28.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
42.80%
Some yoy increase while SEDG is negative at -2484.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
93.62%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SEDG's 20.91%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
67.09%
Some CapEx rise while SEDG is negative at -88.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
328.08%
Acquisition growth of 328.08% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SEDG at -56.69%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-48.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -638.49%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-64.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -1429.40%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
975.10%
We repay more while SEDG is negative at -1045.42%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.96%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.