PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-139.30%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -19.29%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-6.46%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 6.95%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-107.64%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-15.71%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SEDG at -41.05%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-1169.37%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SEDG is 1640.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
12.71%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. SEDG's 725.54%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-112.01%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 24.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-216.63%
Both negative yoy AP, with SEDG at -166.28%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
105.80%
Growth well above SEDG's 50.86%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-88.20%
Both negative yoy, with SEDG at -43.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-7700.65%
Negative yoy CFO while SEDG is 29.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
50.39%
CapEx growth well above SEDG's 17.73%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while SEDG stands at 43.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SEDG is 100.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
187.66%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 78.91%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-172.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -429.81%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-661.45%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.