PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
960.52%
Some net income increase while SEDG is negative at -13.21%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.15%
Less D&A growth vs. SEDG's 8.34%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
495.70%
Some yoy growth while SEDG is negative at -24.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-14.39%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 9.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
135.30%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -92.89%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
511.77%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -4.70%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
184.38%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -124.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
63.67%
Lower AP growth vs. SEDG's 189.64%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-890.78%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -110.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-49.71%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 191.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
111.51%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -44.95%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.84%
CapEx growth well above SEDG's 1.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while SEDG is 95.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.01%
We reduce yoy invests while SEDG stands at 334.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
88.34%
Debt repayment at 75-90% of SEDG's 99.26%. Bill Ackman urges more debt clearance to match competitor’s lower leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.78%
Buyback growth of 78.78% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.