PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
145.21%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 19.32%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-29.50%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 3.28%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-56.05%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 132.57%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.77%
Less SBC growth vs. SEDG's 16.46%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-8.46%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -1289.79%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-26.49%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -96.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-114.81%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 57.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
251.90%
A yoy AP increase while SEDG is negative at -313.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-120.90%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 586.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-107.79%
Both negative yoy, with SEDG at -24.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-311.47%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SEDG at -52.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
22.82%
Some CapEx rise while SEDG is negative at -38.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.62%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SEDG's 1120.17%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-503.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -155.93%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x SEDG's 33.63%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.96%
Buyback growth of 94.96% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.