PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
814.69%
Some net income increase while SEDG is negative at -59.65%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-78.48%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 2.21%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
2799.84%
Well above SEDG's 117.48% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-0.22%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 49.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-118.67%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SEDG is 24.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-125.99%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -1676.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-228.89%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-253.18%
Negative yoy AP while SEDG is 215.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
297.30%
Some yoy usage while SEDG is negative at -162.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-165.75%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 846.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
134.63%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -4.05%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
50.41%
CapEx growth well above SEDG's 1.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
112.76%
Acquisition growth of 112.76% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while SEDG is negative at -1551.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
1927.93%
At 50-75% of SEDG's 3732.41%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
-112.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -97.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
309.96%
We have mild expansions while SEDG is negative at -806.66%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5828.38%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.