PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-112.00%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 70.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.99%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 10.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-122.16%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-9.82%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SEDG at -4.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-285.82%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -70.87%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
129.25%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -82.12%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
53.27%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 69.72%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
69.14%
A yoy AP increase while SEDG is negative at -200.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-106.69%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 558.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
109.60%
Well above SEDG's 200.67%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-367.05%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SEDG at -11.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-2.44%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 32.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.10%
We reduce yoy sales while SEDG is 41.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
Growth well above SEDG's 16.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-101.00%
We reduce yoy invests while SEDG stands at 35.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
110.53%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 91.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.72%
Buyback growth of 51.72% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.