PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
251.05%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 49.93%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
4.18%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 3.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
158.04%
Well above SEDG's 16.39% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
76.81%
SBC growth well above SEDG's 3.88%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
144.69%
Well above SEDG's 24.02% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
312.93%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -24.06%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
222.07%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 357.94%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
25.15%
Lower AP growth vs. SEDG's 148.46%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
198.67%
Some yoy usage while SEDG is negative at -119.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-309.22%
Both negative yoy, with SEDG at -85.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
154.55%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SEDG's 60.63%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-89.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -65.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while SEDG is 64.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
726.30%
We have mild expansions while SEDG is negative at -18.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-504.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -47991.18%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-104.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 37.60%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.