PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-212.76%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 17.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-43.36%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 5.20%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-209.19%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-50.84%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 8.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-294.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SEDG is 30.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-109.07%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -8.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-155.30%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SEDG at -19.24%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
22.47%
A yoy AP increase while SEDG is negative at -115.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-239.17%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 440.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
204.59%
Well above SEDG's 37.31%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-207.64%
Negative yoy CFO while SEDG is 59.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
160.04%
CapEx growth well above SEDG's 29.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19379.11%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -2222.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
1934.60%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 66.03%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
77.12%
Debt repayment at 75-90% of SEDG's 98.98%. Bill Ackman urges more debt clearance to match competitor’s lower leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.34%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of SEDG's 145.81%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.