PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
123.96%
Some net income increase while SEDG is negative at -22.80%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
138.43%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 4.51%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
496.32%
Some yoy growth while SEDG is negative at -94.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
29.62%
SBC growth well above SEDG's 11.53%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
179.66%
Well above SEDG's 116.72% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
3195.72%
AR growth well above SEDG's 46.38%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
412.77%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -522.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-16.07%
Negative yoy AP while SEDG is 4139.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-166.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -84.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-176.68%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 168.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
89.83%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SEDG's 44.98%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-305.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -90.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.94%
We reduce yoy other investing while SEDG is 79.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-173.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -39.20%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
116.41%
Debt repayment above 1.5x SEDG's 12.05%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-209.02%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 18.31%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.