PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-240.92%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -19.12%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
16.39%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 10.46%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-240.35%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 80.71%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-11.41%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 16.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-417.35%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -5309.82%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-125.90%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -440.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-300.90%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 30.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
354.74%
A yoy AP increase while SEDG is negative at -124.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-187.38%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 966.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
100.38%
Some yoy increase while SEDG is negative at -37.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-4410.58%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SEDG at -281.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-66.78%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 21.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while SEDG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12994.15%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SEDG's 41.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-6545.05%
We reduce yoy other investing while SEDG is 144.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
200.90%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 82.45%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-161.73%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-193.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.