PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
328.19%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 64.03%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-35.01%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 5.58%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-155.21%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-7.28%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SEDG at -3.57%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
35.73%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -487.36%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-141.33%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -1256.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-131.78%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SEDG at -126.61%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
517.38%
AP growth well above SEDG's 194.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
59.00%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SEDG's 338.90%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-959.64%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 382.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
90.53%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -92.82%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-8.65%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 31.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
104.42%
Acquisition growth of 104.42% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.62%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 82.44%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.26%
Repurchase growth 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 48.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm invests enough in expansions while boosting EPS.