PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-816.60%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 564.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.10%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 8.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
40.38%
Well above SEDG's 45.67% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
26.72%
SBC growth well above SEDG's 1.63%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-168.21%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -934.79%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-847.07%
AR is negative yoy while SEDG is 31.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
26.57%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 7.20%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-121.59%
Both negative yoy AP, with SEDG at -135.79%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
92.32%
Growth well above SEDG's 11.45%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
90.06%
Some yoy increase while SEDG is negative at -128.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-1062.88%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SEDG at -92.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-101.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 13.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -3041.18%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.26%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SEDG's 711.32%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
783.55%
We have mild expansions while SEDG is negative at -85.55%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-4287.74%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-437.65%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.