PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
92.26%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 3.12%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-97.69%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SEDG at -1.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-100.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-73.52%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 7.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-98.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -413.42%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-73.45%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -37.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-88.44%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 58.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-24.95%
Both negative yoy AP, with SEDG at -1425.10%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-105.01%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 127.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
54.51%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SEDG's 1292.51%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
82.45%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -55.11%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
95.10%
CapEx growth well above SEDG's 34.94%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while SEDG is negative at -68.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while SEDG is 273.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-285.61%
We reduce yoy other investing while SEDG is 86.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
96.23%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SEDG's 284.63%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-108.96%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while SEDG is negative at -625100.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.