PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.27%
Net income growth of 160.27% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
472.13%
Some D&A expansion while SEDG is negative at -24.64%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-167.22%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SEDG at -33.32%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-1003.75%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1494.99%
AR is negative yoy while SEDG is 17.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
9267.16%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -30.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
69.93%
AP growth well above SEDG's 96.77%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
533.59%
Growth well above SEDG's 403.08%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-217.35%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 201.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-18.99%
Negative yoy CFO while SEDG is 119.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
29.81%
CapEx growth of 29.81% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33200.00%
We reduce yoy invests while SEDG stands at 29.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-86.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-91.62%
Negative yoy issuance while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.