1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.70%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 68.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.28%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SEDG at -5.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.81%
SBC growth well above SEDG's 28.62%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
49.14%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
51.86%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -59.66%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
76.86%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -76.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
459.92%
AP growth well above SEDG's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-131.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
86.99%
Some yoy increase while SEDG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
89.72%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SEDG's 174.16%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
100.00%
CapEx growth well above SEDG's 17.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -77.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
100.00%
We have mild expansions while SEDG is negative at -30.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-102.53%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-78.77%
Negative yoy issuance while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.