1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.20%
Net income growth of 18.20% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
9.62%
D&A growth of 9.62% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-421.43%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
172.40%
Inventory growth of 172.40% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-598.83%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-65.92%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-740.28%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-39.88%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-336.87%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
283.33%
Proceeds growth of 283.33% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-1901.10%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-50.68%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.65%
Issuance growth of 83.65% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.