PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.04%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -18.72%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
117.91%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 19.27%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.97%
Working capital change significantly below Solar median of 78.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash vs. peers if no revenue losses occur.
134.34%
AR growth of 134.34% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-783.73%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-138.65%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
54.55%
Under 50% of Solar median of 50.15% if negative or far above if positive. Jim Chanos would sense potential red flags or large tie-ups in these rarely monitored accounts.
2048.96%
Under 50% of Solar median of 25.55% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
88.11%
CFO growth of 88.11% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-28.65%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
43.44%
Proceeds growth of 43.44% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
74.56%
Under 50% of Solar median of 100.00% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would suspect a large mismatch or potential waste if outflows are too high vs. peers.
-195.76%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 10.36%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Solar median is -49.90%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.